🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have voted to withdraw from an global treaty designed to protect females from abuse, covering domestic abuse, following prolonged and heated discussions in the parliament.

Thousands of demonstrators assembled in Riga this past week to voice disagreement with the vote. The final decision now rests with President the nation's president, who must determine whether to approve or reject the proposed law.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only took effect in Latvia last twelve months ago, mandating governments to establish legal frameworks and support services to eliminate all forms of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the first EU country to begin the process of exiting from the treaty. Turkey withdrew in two years ago, a move that rights groups characterized as a significant setback for women's rights.

Ideological Debate and Resistance

The treaty was approved by the European Union in 2023, yet conservative factions have argued that its emphasis on gender equality undermines family values and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy debate in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers decided 56 to 32 to withdraw from the treaty, a move sponsored by political opponents but supported by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a setback for centre-right government leader the nation's PM, who joined protesters outside the legislature earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that abuse will not prevail," she declared to the assembly.

Political Disagreements and Responses

One of the main parties advocating for the exit is Latvia First, whose leader has urged citizens to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

Latvia's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova appealed for the treaty not to be politicized, while the organization the rights organization asserted it was "not a danger to national principles, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The recent decision has sparked widespread outcry both inside the country and internationally.

22,000 individuals have signed a Latvian appeal demanding the convention to be preserved. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has called a protest for the coming week, charging lawmakers of ignoring the wishes of the nation's citizens.

Global Concerns and Potential Next Steps

The head of the European organization's parliamentary assembly stated that the Baltic state had made a rash choice driven by false information. He described it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying regression for female equality and human rights in the continent".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the treaty in 2021, cases of femicide and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not secure a supermajority majority, the head of state could potentially send back the bill for additional review if he holds concerns.

Head of State Rinkevics announced on social media that he would assess the vote according to constitutional principles, "taking into account state and legal factors, instead of belief-based viewpoints".

Last week, another component of the governing alliance, the reformist party, indicated it would not rule out petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a concerning development for gender equality not only in our nation but across Europe," stated a human rights advocate.

• Family violence rates have been increasing in multiple European countries
• The Istanbul Convention requires particular legal protections for victims of gender-based violence
• The nation's decision could affect comparable discussions in other EU countries